This past February, Obama was accused of plagiarism by supporters of Hillary Clinton — Obama and Borrowed Words. Now that he has announced Joe Biden as his choice for vice-president, we are reminded of this old story. From Wikipedia:

In 1987, Joe Biden ran as a Democratic presidential candidate….

By August 1987, however, Biden’s campaign had already begun to lag behind those of Michael Dukakis and Richard Gephardt. Then in September 1987, the campaign ran into serious trouble when he was accused of plagiarizing a speech by Neil Kinnock, then-leader of the British Labour Party. Though Biden had correctly credited the original author in all speeches but one, the one where he failed to make mention of the originator was caught on video.

Within days, it was also discovered that as a first-year law student at Syracuse Law School, Biden had plagiarized a law review article in a class paper he wrote. Though the dean of the law school in 1988 as well as Biden’s former professor played down the incident of plagiarism, they did find that Biden drew “chunks of heavy legal prose directly from” the article in question. Biden said the act was inadvertent due to his not knowing the proper rules of citation, and Biden was permitted to retake the course after receiving a grade of F, which was subsequently dropped from his record. Biden also released his undergraduate grades, which started off poorly and remained unexceptional. Further, when questioned by a New Hampshire resident about his grades in law school Biden had claimed falsely to have graduated in the “top half” of his class, (when he actually graduated 76th in a class of 85) that he had attended on a full scholarship, and had received three degrees. In fact he had received two majors, History and Political Science, and a single B.A., as well as a half scholarship based on financial need.

Faced with these revelations, Biden withdrew from the nomination race on September 23, 1987, saying his candidacy had been overrun by “the exaggerated shadow” of his mistakes.

Back in February, when the plagiarism issue was dogging Obama, the very prescient Taylor Marsh recalled the old story cited above:

When Senator Joe Biden was found to have lifted pieces of someone else’s speech he was politically humiliated. One wonders what the reaction to Senator Obama will be, now that we find out that those all important words he’s been spouting are not his own. Will the standard be different for him?….

Barack Obama isn’t an original. He’s the first 21st century L. Ron Hubbard of politics, Elmer Gantry, name your huckster.

“I have a dream” just became “I have a con.”

Speechwriter David Frum had this to say:

Obama is a candidate all about words – he has zero record of executive leadership, precious little of legislative accomplishment. It’s all about the speeches. So if the speeches aren’t his own … what is there to him exactly?