permalink  Breaking — Obama Not Certified Legally Eligible

Barack Obama and Joe Biden were not certified as legally eligible in the affidavits sent to the states by the Democratic National Committee. The tireless research of political writer J.B. Williams has uncovered the discrepancy.

His bombshell article appears in the Canada Free PressThe Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don’t Lie:

Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?….

The proper legal text used on the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” document reads as follows, and I quote;

“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”…. [ADMC note: Proper form of certification - Popup facsimile]

The “Official Certification of Nomination” that was presented by the DNC in all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was singed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008.

But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;

“- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote;

“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:…” [ADMC note: Abridged form of certification, actually sent to the states - Popup facsimile]

Williams concludes that to cover this up in the face of overwhelming evidence that Obama is not legally eligible to be president would have required complicity throughout the Democratic Party and in all three branches of government. As a minimum, every one of the fifty state election boards must have realized that they did not receive the proper form.

We have to agree. We have been cataloguing the mounting evidence since the primary campaign, and have remained in disbelief that so many intelligent folk could refuse to see the obvious.

Related:

The Right Side of LifeDNC’s Obama Presidential Eligibility Certification Doubted

Bookmark and Share

Send a link:  Tell a friend about this.
Link to this post:  Permalink
Send us your link:  Trackback link
Filed under: Politics
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


6 Responses to “Breaking — Obama Not Certified Legally Eligible
  1. The Right Side of Life » DNC’s Obama Presidential Eligibility Certification Doubted says:

    [...] AmericanDaughter.com’s take on the above-referenced article: Barack Obama and Joe Biden were not certified as legally eligible [...]

  2. Tim Long says:

    If Obama has a Real Birth Cert. from Hawaii He should get his butt on AF1 right now, fly over, get it out and let HONEST PEOPLE who the Country trust on boh side to see it. His Grandma said He was Not Born In Hawaii. She was there when He came out of His Mother. She held Him when He was covered in after birth. “Why would She lie?” It would be so easy to prove this and the Media is not even trying to do their job, because now their jo is covering for Him every chance they get.

  3. HLC says:

    Read the info on the following site. It has a very complete analysis
    of this situation, and solution, written some days ago. There is also
    a model complaint that can be adapted for any state of any of you out
    there want to graduate to putting your money where your mouth is! I am
    for one. Here is all you need to know:
    http://jbjd.wordpress.com/

  4. Starbeau says:

    I continue to read many blogs that state that due to Obama’s mother being a US Citizen, and being born in Hawaii, Obama is therefore a natural born citizen. The words they like is Obama is a Fourteenth Amendment natural born citizen. Sounds good doesn’t it!

    This letter from Senator Diane Feinstein to a constituent (x’d out) perpetuates the fraud:

    “From: senator@feinstein.senate.gov
    Subject: U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein responding to your message
    To: xxxxxxxx@yahoo.com
    Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 1:59 PM

    Dear Mr. xxxxxxx:

    Thank you for writing regarding President Barack Obama’s qualifications to be President. I appreciate hearing from you and I apologize for the delay in my response.

    Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution specifies the qualifications for this executive office. It states that no person except for a natural born American citizen is eligible to run for President of the United States. Also, the candidate must be at least thirty-five years of age and have resided in the United States for at least fourteen years.

    President Obama meets these constitutional requirements. He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, all persons born in the United States are considered citizens of the United States.”

    The above letter is also an example of “willful blindness”, “willful non-compliance” and Misprision because Senator Feinstein voted for SR 511 (it was a unanimous vote) declaring McCain was a natural born citizen. As part of the proceedings with that resolution, Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Chairman, had entered into the record his questioning of Michael Chertoff (a formal Federal Judge) during Chertoff’s confirmation hearing for Secretary of Homeland Security. Secretary Chertoff stated and Senator Leahy agreed that natural born meant a child born on American soil whose parents were citizens “at birth” of the child.

    The Fourteenth Amendment states:
    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

    In Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment (1998) the court said “jurisdiction is a word of many, too many, meanings.”

    Therefore, it is important to discover the operational meaning behind “subject to the jurisdiction” as employed under the Fourteenth Amendment rather then assuming its meaning from other usages of the word jurisdiction alone.

    Both Sen. Lyman Trumbull and Sen. Jacob Howard, key figures in the drafting and adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, responding to questions of the meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States declared it to mean “complete” jurisdiction.
    Senator Howard, who introduced the language of the jurisdiction clause on the floor of the Senate, contended that it should be construed to mean “a full and complete jurisdiction, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now”.

    Senator Trumbull, declared:
    The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’
    “Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.”
    In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean:

    The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

    George Collins asked the question detailed in an earlier blog by Mr. LeoDonofrio:

    ARE PERSONS BORN WITHIN THE UNITED STATES IPSO FACTO CITIZENS THEREOF?
    GEORGE D COLLINS
    The American Law Review (1866-1906); Sep/Oct 1884; 18, American Periodicals Series Online pg. 831

    The answer is no!

    Obama was not born under the jurisdiction of the United States and therefore was not a “Fourteenth Amendment” citizen. Obama was not a citizen of the United States at birth!

    There is no need to define natural born citizen. You must conclude that if your not a “citizen”, you cannot be a natural born citizen.

    And if your not a “citizen” and your living in the United States, what are you?

  5. Geir (Gerhardt) Smith says:

    obama the antichrist

  6. Susanne says:

    If you truly want to do something for your country, find out if there was voter fraud in your state, YOU can do something,
    this website will show you what you can do.
    http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/the-cheese-stands-alone/