By Paul E. Vallely | Monday, June 7th, 2010 at 1:43 am
[These remarks were delivered at the Lincoln Reagan Dinner held this past Saturday night, June 5th, 2010 in Virginia City, Montana.]
The Declaration of Independence states:
“To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”
We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and Halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to lead us down the road of Progressive Socialism and destruction of America. This is the current battle that we Constitutionalists face and we must be aggressive in our efforts. Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution of officials now come into play as relates to our National Character, National Security, Economy and the Nation’s well-being and is the rationale for resignations. Demand Resignation of derelict officials by the people of this country in now required.
Where is our Moral Compass?
The oath of office is simple and reads:
“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder.
The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which granted the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of authority and individual liberty was understood. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution with a certain and meaningful intent for check and balances.
Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address:
“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”
Being a representative republic, not a democracy, “rising up” means other than revolution by means of arms. The people must “rise up” from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power … resignation, death, elections, and impeachment.
“We the People” have had enough. Enough is Enough. The Obama White House and identifiable Members of Congress are now on a progressive socialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. “We, the People” cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen’s interests above self-interest by resigning immediately. Our so-called Representatives and Senators are more interested in party loyalty than performing their duties. So, do not expect them to resign en masse or be impeached. Therefore the “people” must decide. A civil uprising is still not out of the question. They know which side of the bread their butter is on and it is not on our side.
We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetoro (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) — based on Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution.
And a call for a National Petition for new elections to select the next President of the United States of America must be initiated. We can wait no longer for a change of Power and new Government.
Reference:
Diana West — “The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama”
….The fact is, the birth certificate controversy is only the beginning of the presidential mystery. There is so much we don’t know for certain about President Obama. Inexplicably but intriguigingly, he has failed to produce his bona fides, while the media (and the White House media in particular), who could ask for them, don’t care, or don’t want to care….
1) the original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate….
2) Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) — not found, not released
3) Obama’s baptism records — sealed
4) Obama’s adoption records — sealed
5) Records of Obama’s and his mother’s reptriation as US citizens on return from Indonesia — not found, not released
6) Name change (Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama) records — not found, not released
7) Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) — not released
8) Punahou School financial aid or school records — not released
9) Occidental College financial aid records — not released. (These records were, however, subpoenaed but Obama lawyers succeeded in quashing the subpoena in court. No other Occi records have been released.)
10) Columbia College records — not released
11) Columbia senior thesis — not released
12) Harvard Law School records (not mentioned below, but not released)
13) Obama’s law client list — sealed
14) Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator — sealed
15) Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association — sealed
16) Obama’s medical records — not released
17) Obama’s passport records — not released
Read all of the evidence accumulated by Ms. West here.
[Editor's note: We are aware that an unauthorized hate group has bootlegged our copyrighted material, added their own message at the end of the video version, and used our intellectual property to solicit donations. What they have done is completely illegal. It does not in any way derive from the speech made by MGEN Vallely, nor does it reflect the goals and values of our news magazine.]
© Paul E. Vallely, all rights reserved, published with permission. Paul E. Vallely, MGEN, US Army, (ret) is a graduate of West Point who served his country from 1961 through 1993, retiring as Deputy Commanding General, Pacific. He is currently a senior military analyst for Fox News and Chairman of Stand Up America USA.
By Nancy Matthis | Saturday, March 6th, 2010 at 2:49 pm
This question has never been definitively answered, and a large number of citizens agonize over the possibility that the Constitution has been set aside by a majority vote of gullible kool-aid drinkers. They are puzzled by his use of many different names, by ambiguities in his social security history, by his clumsily forged Selective Service registration actually fabricated in 2008, unexplained passport discrepancies, and by his classification as a “foreign student” while attending college in the United States. There is absolutely no excuse for his steadfast refusal to make a copy of his birth certificate, showing hospital of birth, available.
The most recent polling shows that just 51% of Americans believe that Obama is eligible to be president, and that almost half of U.S. citizens say he’s not a “legitimate president.” Already, six states are considering legislation requiring proof of eligibility to that state before being certified to be on election ballots there — Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.The Obama Eligibility Question Lives On:
The constitutional issues are discussed in The New Media Journal –
If we can agree that Obama’s father, a citizen of Kenya, then a British colony, was a British subject at the time of his birth, a fact that Obama himself has attested to on numerous occasions, it is evident that, under Part 2, Section 5[1] of the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama was born with automatic British citizenship “by decent” from his father. Thus, it is an inescapable fact that Obama held dual US-British citizenship from the date of his birth, August 4, 1961, until December 12, 1963, the day that Kenya won its independence from Great Britain.
However, Article VI, Section 87[3](2) of the Kenyan Constitution states that “Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (Obama Jr.), or a British protected person, shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.”
Therefore, setting aside the possibility that Obama may have acquired Indonesian citizenship when his mother married Indonesian Lolo Soetoro and moved to Jakarta in 1967, it is clear that Obama held dual US-Kenyan citizenship from December 12, 1963, the date of Kenyan independence, until at least his 21st birthday on August 4, 1982, when he claims to have been a student at Columbia University in New York.
In either event, Barack Obama is clearly not a “natural born” U.S. citizens and is, therefore, ineligible to serve in the office he occupies….
In a December 8, 2008 discussion of the congressional certification process, Dr. Edwin Viera, Jr., Ph.D., J.D., a leading authority on the Constitution, argues that, “…the question of Obama’s eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of Congress to skirt or decide as its Members may deem politically or personally expedient.
“Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense with the requirement that Obama must be ‘a natural born Citizen,’ by simply assuming that he is such, or by accepting something other than what lawyers call ‘the best evidence.’ ” (e.g. Obama’s published certificate of live birth, versus a certified Hawaiian birth certificate)
Dr. Viera argues that, if no objection is made on the basis that Obama is not a natural born citizen (in which case an Elector cannot constitutionally vote for him)…the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a “constitutional sufficiency (emphasis added),” because Congress has no power to simply waive the Constitution’s eligibility requirement…
This leaves us with the question, if the Congress acts irresponsibly, indifferently, or not at all, is the issue foreclosed forever? Not at all. Instead, Dr. Viera suggests that the time will come when the Justice Department will attempt to enforce, through criminal prosecutions, some of the controversial legislation that the new Congress will enact and Obama will sign into law. Then, “as a matter of undeniable constitutional right and practical necessity,” a class of litigants with absolute standing will come into existence.
With Obama occupying the Oval Office, that day has already arrived. We need only to await the courageous individual(s) who will stand on principle, demanding that the laws they are required to obey were signed into law by a president eligible to do so…that they are, in fact, the law of the land.
Above all, the American people must understand what it means to simply ignore Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution…for no better reason than that it would be incredibly messy to remove Obama at this late date. For one to take that position, one must then also be willing to cavalierly set aside other provisions of the Constitution….
More and more people are beginning to take the question of eligibility seriously as Obama’s popularity slides with poor performance. But that misses the essential point. Even if (Barry, Barack)/(Dunham, Soetoro, Obama) were a very capable executive, it would be wrong to violate our constitution. That frail and aging paper is all that protects our natural freedoms, and it is what generations of Americans have purchased for us with their lives. We must honor it.
Tail wag

Tail wag: The Steady Drip
By Nancy Matthis | Thursday, October 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 am
The Berg vs. Obama lawsuit in Philadelphia Federal Court has resulted in an Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement against Obama.
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56(c) is GRANTED. This Court Declares Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen and is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States. The Democratic National Committee is hereby enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot and both the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency. It is an ORDER of this Court that Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.
It is further ORDER of this Court; Defendants are to pay Plaintiff $48,300.00, representing all fees and costs associated with this suit to date.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: October ________, 2008
____________________________
Hon. R. Barclay Surrick
United States District Court Judge
For the Eastern District of PA
Some are reporting that this has already happened. Others are trying to find out whether the judge has yet signed.
Our best understanding at this time is that Berg filed the “Motion for Summary Judgement” yesterday, and that a ruling was expected within one or two days.
What is not clear is whether the “Order on Plaintiff’s Motion” was prepared by Berg, and submitted along with his motion, or whether it was prepared by the court in response to his motion.
We are waiting with bated breath — we will keep our readers supplied with the most current info. Did Hillary know this all along? Talk about your October surprise!
This comes on the same day as breaking news about Obama’s close connection to American Negro communist Frank Marshall Davis, published author, dope user, and closet pornographer, who may be the photographer who took nude photographs of the free-spirited Anne Dunham, and who later was Obama’s childhood mentor for nine years. See the “Obama Mama” here, here, and here.
References:
Nude photos of Obama’s mother courtesy of the courageous Astute Blogger who is taking a tremendous risk to share information on the forces that shaped Obama’s psyche.
The liberal Lisa Derrick of Huffington Post writes an apologia for the pornography of Frank Marshall Davis.
We owe our “heads up” on this breaking news to the very brave lady who blogs as AmericanUnclassified because she refuses to succumb to a political party label. Read her recent article What Sarah Palin And Clay Aiken Have In Common. She has also cited several articles of interest:
Barack Obama is not Barack Obama — Radio talk show host and author (Obama: The Man Behind The Mask) Andy Martin is in Hawaii investigating the facts surrounding Obama’s birth. He concludes that the birth certificate is being suppressed because the father’s name was changed, and that Obama is really the illegitimate son of American Negro communist Frank Marshall Davis. No lightweight, Martin holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law.
On Matters of October Surprises and Media Malpractice — Family Security Matters, in a very well-organized article, documents the failure of the mainstream media to investigate or report on any of the stories concerning Obama’s negatives. The MSM appears to be skewing the polls, leveraging reverse racism, ignoring disaffected Hillary Clinton supporters, and failing to examine millions in foreign currency contributions to the Obama campaign.
Obama citizenship questions continue — West Palm Beach television station Channel 5 reports:
It’s been Internet gossip for months. Is Barack Obama a U.S. citizen?….
…an attorney in Philadelphia, Philip Berg, filed a lawsuit claiming Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian man. Berg says Obama failed to take an oath of allegiance when he turned 18.
Obama has attempted to silence any critics by producing a birth certificate from Hawaii, proving he was born there in 1961. Berg however is demanding an original, and not a copy from the Obama camp.
Obama’s team filed a motion to dismiss Berg’s lawsuit, but they also made a motion to block discovery….
There are currently three separate lawsuits regarding the circumstances of Obama’s birth:
Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083 in the Philadelphia Federal District Court.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed by Andy Martin on October 17th in Honolulu to get the Hawaiin Department of Health to release Obama’s birth certificate — an original birth certificate, and not a copy.
Citizen files Lawsuit demanding verification of Barack Obama’s citizenship status –Plaintiff Steven Marquis is suing the Washington Secretary of State, demanding that he verify Obama’s citizenship status before the election.
The complaint seeks specifically that the office of the Washington Secretary of State verify and certify that Mr. Obama is or is not a “natural born” citizen by producing original or certified verifiable official documents. The lawsuit argues that this certification should take place before the election to preclude a constitutional crisis and likely civil unrest should such certification, after the election, prove that Mr. Obama was not qualified for office.
The Complaint argues that the Secretary of State has the authority and duty to not only certify the voters but also and most importantly the candidates and in so doing prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters who would had had an opportunity to choose from qualified candidates had the certification preceded the election process.
At this point, Mr. Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his birth records nor supporting hospital records. The Hawaii Health Department has violated Federal law by ignoring formal Freedom of Information requests for the same….
By John Stephenson | Thursday, August 21st, 2008 at 11:57 am
For a while, it has seemed that all the weblog speculation about Obama’s birth certification was in vain, when Fact Check gave the document proffered by the Obama campaign their approval:
In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a natural-born citizen. But the image prompted more blog-based skepticism about the document’s authenticity. And recently, author Jerome Corsi, whose book attacks Obama, said in a TV interview that the birth certificate the campaign has is “fake.”
We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.
Of course this isn’t going to end anything. Check this out. It isn’t just about whether he was born here, but whether multiple citizenships, updated birth certificates, etc. threaten his validity to even run.
A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.
Phillip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit–just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver–for the health of the Democratic Party.
“I filed this action at this time,” Berg stated, “to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.”.
Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator’s background, and in today’s lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls “dual loyalties” due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia.
Even if Sen. Obama can prove his U.S. citizenship, Berg stated, citing the senator’s use of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii verified as a forgery by three independent document forensic experts, the issue of “multi-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegiance to other countries” remains on the table.
In the lawsuit, Berg states that Sen. Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the senator maintains. Before giving birth, according to the lawsuit, Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya with his father but was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy, “apparently a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight.” As Sen. Obama’s own paternal grandmother, half-brother and half-sister have also claimed, Berg maintains that Stanley Ann Dunham–Obama’s mother–gave birth to little Barack in Kenya and subsequently flew to Hawaii to register the birth.
Berg cites inconsistent accounts of Sen. Obama’s birth, including reports that he was born at two separate hospitals–Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital–in Honolulu, as well a profound lack of birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham, though simple “registry of birth” records for Barack Obama are available in a Hawaiian public records office.
Should Sen. Obama truly have been born in Kenya, Berg writes, the laws on the books at the time of his birth hold that U.S. citizenship may only pass to a child born overseas to a U.S. citizen parent and non-citizen parent if the former was at least 19 years of age. Sen. Obama’s mother was only 18 at the time. Therefore, because U.S. citizenship could not legally be passed on to him, Obama could not be registered as a “natural born” citizen and would therefore be ineligible to seek the presidency pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.
Moreover, even if Sen. Obama could have somehow been deemed “natural born,” that citizenship was lost in or around 1967 when he and his mother took up residency in Indonesia, where Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Berg also states that he possesses copies of Sen. Obama’s registration to Fransiskus Assisi School In Jakarta, Indonesia which clearly show that he was registered under the name “Barry Soetoro” and his citizenship listed as Indonesian.
Of course no media is reporting on this. This could get very interesting.
Original post at Stop The ACLU — Update: Obama Sued on Grounds He is Constitutionally Ineligible. Obama Is a U.S. Citizen
From America’s Right — Eligibility Goes Beyond Citizenship
From America’s Right — Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court on Grounds he is Constitutionally Ineligible for the Presidency
Early coverage by Texas Darlin’ — *BREAKING* Lawsuit Being Filed Today in Philadelphia *MEDIA ALERT*
Update from Texas Darlin’ lists the aliases named in the lawsuit — Update on Federal Lawsuit
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a
BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a
BARRY OBAMA , a/k/a
BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a
BARRY DUNHAM
This article is cross-posted from Stop The ACLU as part of a weblog coalition effort.
|